The security frameworks your organization uses to protect traditional software were not designed for AI. A new attack surface has emerged, one that includes adversarial inputs that corrupt model outputs, poisoned training data that embeds backdoors, model extraction attacks that steal your intellectual property, and inference APIs that leak sensitive training data through clever querying. This 52-page guide gives security teams, CISOs, and AI program leaders the complete framework for securing enterprise AI systems across the full model lifecycle, from data ingestion through production API exposure.
The eight-category AI threat taxonomy covering adversarial examples, data poisoning, model inversion, membership inference, model stealing, prompt injection, supply chain attacks on pre-trained models, and API-level abuse patterns, with attack severity ratings and detection difficulty scores drawn from documented incidents across regulated industries.
The AI-specific security architecture framework covering secure data pipeline design, training environment isolation, model registry access controls, inference API hardening, and the monitoring instrumentation that detects adversarial inputs and model drift before they produce incorrect outputs in production decisions affecting customers or regulatory compliance.
LLM-specific security requirements for enterprise GenAI deployments, including prompt injection defense architecture, RAG system data access controls, tool-calling authorization frameworks, system prompt confidentiality, and the output filtering approaches that prevent sensitive data exfiltration through conversational interfaces used by internal and external users.
AI supply chain risk management covering third-party model vetting, pre-trained model security scanning, open-source dependency risk in ML frameworks, model hub governance, API vendor security assessment, and the contractual protections that establish AI vendor security obligations including incident notification timelines and audit rights.
Regulatory intersection: EU AI Act, DORA, and NIST AI RMF security requirements for high-risk AI systems, including the documentation standards that demonstrate security due diligence to regulators, the incident reporting obligations when AI security events affect regulated outputs, and the board-level AI security reporting framework for audit committee oversight.
The AI security program maturity roadmap across four levels from reactive vulnerability response through proactive adversarial red-teaming, including the team structure, tooling stack, and integration points with existing SOC operations that security leaders use to extend existing security programs to cover AI without building a separate AI security function from scratch.